Legal Brief - Week 07: PG&E Corp. vs Federal Power Commission
PG&E Corp.
vs Federal Power Commission
Bankruptcy Case
No. 19-30088-DM
Case Facts
Pacific
Gas & Electric Corporate (PG&E) was incorporated on October 10,
1905, to provide the transmission and delivery of energy (natural gas and
electricity) to millions of customers in San Francisco, California.
On
January 29, 2019, the organization filed voluntary bankruptcy
petitions under Chapter 11 of the U.S. Bankruptcy Code; this came after a
series of wildfire’s incidents leading the California Department of Forestry
and Fire Protection to assign the blame on PG&E. These findings led the
company to a potential liabilities of $30 billion. Victims’ claims consist of
injuries, death, property and business losses, and other legal damages worth
$13.5 billion.
Petitioners
(PG&E customers) sought the court to review an order issued by the Federal
Power Commission (FPC) issued a statement of policy instructing Californian
pipeline companies that expected shortage in their stock to file tariff sheets
in order to prevent them from liability. The order wants petitioners to have a
low priority to electric generating companies. Petitioners argued that the policy was
procedurally defective for failure to comply with the rulemaking requirements
of the Administrative Procedure Act, 5 U.S.C.S. § 551 et seq. which requires a 30-day delayed effective date to allow
comments.
In order
to exit bankruptcy and participate in the California state wildfire insurance
fund, PG&E was required to provide compensation to the Californian wildfire
victims before June 30, 2020. On the 20th of June 2020, U.S.
Bankruptcy Judge Dennis Montali issued the final approval of the plan for
reorganized PG&E to exit bankruptcy.
The Issue
Is the
Federal Power Commission’s order exempted from the Administrative Procedure Act
(APA), 5 U.S.C.S. § 551 et seq. in this situation?
Rule
The United States Environmental Protection
Agency summaries the Administrative Procedure Act
as follows: “… governs the process by which federal agencies develop and issue
regulations. It includes requirements for publishing notices of proposed and
final rulemaking in the Federal
Register and provides opportunities for the public to comment
on notices of proposed rulemaking. The APA requires most rules to have a 30-day
delayed effective date.
In addition to setting forth
rulemaking procedures, the APA addresses other agency actions such as the
issuance of policy statements, licenses, and permits. It also provides
standards for judicial review if a person has been adversely affected or
aggrieved by agency action.
The
Administrative Conference of the United States explains that “policy
statements include all substantive non-legislative rules to the extent that
they are not limited to interpreting existing law. They come with a variety of
labels and include guidance, guidelines, manuals, staff instructions, opinion
letters, press releases or other informal captions.” And the Legal Information
Institute defines substantive law as a “law which governs the
original rights and obligations of individuals. Substantive
law may derive from the common law, statutes, or
a constitution.” Thus a statement of policy is not a legal rule or law but usually
leads to the identification of new laws needed to achieve its goals.
Application
After a series of major wildfires, including fires for which
PG&E expected to be held liable, filing a voluntary bankruptcy petition on
January 29, 2019, under Chapter 11 of the U.S. Bankruptcy Code was the last
solution for PG&E to reorganize the company. The company provided
compensation to wildfire victims as part of the plan for reorganization in the
Chapter 11 case to exit bankruptcy.
The bankruptcy court
instructed PG&E to meet certain criteria such as its insolvency proceeding
must be resolved by no later than June 30, 2020, as per the drafted plan in
order to benefit from the wildfire Fund established by the California Assembly
Bill (AB) 1054.
The AB 1054 assigned a
Commission to assist with the bankruptcy process and has documented the
following:
·
The commission has approved the
reorganization plan and other documents resolving the insolvency proceeding,
including the electrical corporation’s resulting governance structure as being
acceptable in light of the electrical corporation’s safety history, criminal
probation, recent financial condition, and other factors deemed relevant by the
commission.
·
The commission has determined that
the reorganization plan and other documents resolving the insolvency proceeding
are
o (i) consistent with the state’s climate goals as required pursuant
to the California Renewables Portfolio Standard Program and related procurement
requirements of the state and
o (ii) neutral, on average, to the ratepayers of the electrical
corporation.
·
The commission has determined that
the reorganization plan and other documents resolving the insolvency proceeding
recognize the contributions of ratepayers if any, and compensate them
accordingly through
The wildfires caused PG&E to file for
bankruptcy and created a shortage in the supply of natural energy and
electricity which led to the FPC to enter into conflict with PG&E’s
customers. While battling to find relief funds for the pipeline companies, FPC
needs to face unhappy petitioners. The case showed the FPC motive behind the
policy statement to prevent a shortage supply of energy. Furthermore, the court
did not find the commission guilty because this was rather a policy statement
and not substantive law.
Ruling
The court ruled that the policy statement
issued by the Federal Power Commission was not defective since there was no
direct impact upon the petitioners; thus lacking jurisdiction.
Reference
Michael H
(2021). “Business Law.”
Brigham Young University - Idaho, Chapter 13 - 14
Legal
Information Institute. “5 U.S. Code § 551 - Definitions”. 1992
https://www.epa.gov/laws-regulations/summary-administrative-procedure-act (Accessed 30 October 2021)
Legal
Information Institute. “Substantive law”. 1992
https://www.law.cornell.edu/wex/substantive_law
(Accessed 30 October 2021)
Administrative
Conference of the United States. “Policy statement”. 1992
https://www.acus.gov/recommendation/agency-policy-statements.
(Accessed 30 October 2021)
Energy Central.
“PUC decision approving reorganization plan”. June 2020
https://energycentral.com/news/california-puc-decision-approving-reorganization-plan-0. (Accessed 30 October 2021)
Comments
Post a Comment